<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ang Laro ng Buhay ni Juan Movie: Good or Bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://famewatcher.com/2009/10/ang-laro-ng-buhay-ni-juan-movie-good-or-bad.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://famewatcher.com/2009/10/ang-laro-ng-buhay-ni-juan-movie-good-or-bad.html</link>
	<description>Celebrity Fashion:  Jeans, Leather Jacket, Coat, Underwear, Wedding Dress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:19:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: macho man</title>
		<link>http://famewatcher.com/2009/10/ang-laro-ng-buhay-ni-juan-movie-good-or-bad.html#comment-3203</link>
		<dc:creator>macho man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://famewatcher.com/?p=10259#comment-3203</guid>
		<description>mather paking bakla boys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mather paking bakla boys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://famewatcher.com/2009/10/ang-laro-ng-buhay-ni-juan-movie-good-or-bad.html#comment-2683</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://famewatcher.com/?p=10259#comment-2683</guid>
		<description>I agree; gay films are too artsy and make no money.  I am not sure what benefit is does especially in developing countries where a different more &#039;machismo&#039; face wants to be put on. Anything that is too black or too white is too much like Bernie Madoff and his OCD for me. I do not watch many of these films but if one collects things are not always as they seem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree; gay films are too artsy and make no money.  I am not sure what benefit is does especially in developing countries where a different more &#8216;machismo&#8217; face wants to be put on. Anything that is too black or too white is too much like Bernie Madoff and his OCD for me. I do not watch many of these films but if one collects things are not always as they seem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john paul</title>
		<link>http://famewatcher.com/2009/10/ang-laro-ng-buhay-ni-juan-movie-good-or-bad.html#comment-2651</link>
		<dc:creator>john paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://famewatcher.com/?p=10259#comment-2651</guid>
		<description>Yes, its a sad thing that there are a lot of not so good films.  

We were one of those who were able to watch it at Mogwai Cafe in a Special Screening.

My verdict:  Gay Characters but not a gay film!!!!

Very good though.  It is actually the &quot;laro&quot; that ordinary &quot;juan&quot; plays to survive the vicious cycle of poverty.  introspective film but not preachy.  It had scenes that would have turned out exploitative and yet was treated with caution and prudence.  

I heard a filmmaker who was also there said that it is at par with Kubrador.  I seem to agree.

But, hey, you might want to see it for yourself.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, its a sad thing that there are a lot of not so good films.  </p>
<p>We were one of those who were able to watch it at Mogwai Cafe in a Special Screening.</p>
<p>My verdict:  Gay Characters but not a gay film!!!!</p>
<p>Very good though.  It is actually the &#8220;laro&#8221; that ordinary &#8220;juan&#8221; plays to survive the vicious cycle of poverty.  introspective film but not preachy.  It had scenes that would have turned out exploitative and yet was treated with caution and prudence.  </p>
<p>I heard a filmmaker who was also there said that it is at par with Kubrador.  I seem to agree.</p>
<p>But, hey, you might want to see it for yourself.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
